Neha Kumar & Agnes R. Quisumbing (IFPRI)

Access it here

This paper assesses long-term impacts of vegetable and polyculture fish production technologies on a variety of measures of household and individual well-being in Bangladesh. In 1996–1997, households were surveyed in three sites where nongovernmental organizations and extension programs were disseminating agricultural technologies—about two to six years after the technologies were first introduced. The same households were reinterviewed in 2006–2007.

Using nearest-neighbor matching to construct a statistical comparison group, we find that long-term impacts differ across agricultural technology interventions and across outcomes. Long-term impacts on household-level consumption expenditures and asset accumulation are, in general, insignificant in the improved vegetables sites, but are positive and significant in the individually operated fishponds sites. Interestingly, impacts on individual nutrient intake, nutrient adequacy, and nutritional status do not necessarily follow the pattern of household-level impacts. The improved vegetable program, despite insignificant or even negative impacts at the household level, seems to have resulted in increases in vitamin A consumption (and iron consumption for men), an increase in average weight-for-age Z-scores among children, and a reduction in the proportion of girls stunted and the proportion of boys underweight. Women in the improved vegetable program also experienced increases in body mass index. Impacts in the group-operated fishponds sites on nutrient intake are mostly negative, although we do find improvements in weight-for-age Z-scores and a decline in stunting and wasting among boys. Although one would expect significant improvements in nutritional status in the individually operated fishponds sites, impacts on nutritional status are mixed. Nutrient availability and the fraction of members consuming the recommended daily allowances have improved significantly for most nutrients considered, among men and women. Although indicators of long-term nutritional status worsen, short-term nutritional status indicators improve. The fraction of women with low hemoglobin levels also decreases significantly. We argue that the differences in long-term and short-term impacts arise from several causes: differences in dissemination and targeting mechanisms that may affect what types of households adopt and benefit from the technologies; initial existing differences between control and treatment groups (controlled for using matching methods); the degree to which a technology is divisible and easily disseminated outside the treatment group; and finally, intrahousehold allocation processes that determine how gains from the new technology are allocated among household members.

More: http://genderfoodpolicy.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/publication-access-adoption-and-diffusion-understanding-the-long-term-impacts-of-improved-vegetable-and-fish-technologies-in-bangladesh/

The Post reports US expert: China oil spill far bigger than stated

A worker cleans up the oil at the Nantuo Fishing Harbor.

More: http://sharmamridul.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/china-oil-spill/

A view of the Kashrote locality, near AKRSP office – Images: Sher Shah & Asghar Khan – via PAMIR TIMES

More: http://pamirtimes.net/2010/07/30/pictory-ii-floods-in-gilgit-city/

More: http://ismailimail.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/floods-in-gilgit-city-via-pamir-times/

Mankind’s selfishness and greed is going to eventually destroy this planet. The animal kingdom is certainly in jeopardy as long as we continue deforestation, poaching and polluting oceans, lakes and rivers. TGO

Refer to story below. Source: Associated Press

JAKARTA, Indonesia – The most threatened tortoise in the world is being sold openly at a plant and animal exposition in the heart of Indonesia’s capital, highlighting concerns about the rampant — and growing — illegal pet trade.

The country has become a major trading hub for endangered tortoises and freshwater turtles, including species from Africa, South America and Asia, said Chris Shepherd of TRAFFIC, a British-based international wildlife monitoring network

He said the government has failed to follow up on repeated promises to crackdown.

Those found Friday at Jakarta’s annual flora and fauna expo — held from July 2 until Aug. 2 — included the world’s most threatened ploughshare tortoise and the critically endangered radiated tortoises, both from Madagascar and fetching around $150.

Cages also were filled with rare Indian star tortoises, which are protected under the Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species, known as CITES, and the endangered pig-nose tortoise, from Indonesia’s easternmost province of Papua, both selling for $1,500.

Vendors told The Associated Press other threatened tortoises and turtles not found on display could easily be obtained for a price.

“Recent surveys, and this expo, have shown that the trade continues and, in fact, now involves more illegally imported species than ever,” said Shepherd. “Dealers know full well that it is illegal and are taking advantage of the enforcement agencies lack of action.”

Indonesia, one of the most biologically diverse nations in the world, has for years sold everything from eagles and leopard cats to gibbons as pets in the capital, though often less openly. Shady transactions continue to take place in the back alleys of the popular Pramuka Market.

____

Online:

TRAFFIC: http://www.traffic.org/reptiles-amphibians/

Ploughshare Tortoise: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/9016/0

Radiated Tortoise: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/9014/0

More: http://thegreatone22.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/expo-shows-illegal-pet-trade-rampant-in-indonesia/

All of our unplanned, haphazard, Sam’ll-handle-it traveling had been going swimmingly, but we finally hit a snag this morning.  We arrive back in China after the splendid overnight train from Shanghai and take a taxi straight to the Liyun Apartotels that were so good to us.  We explode into the lobby, a dust cloud of backpacks and random limbs.

But it’s booked solid.  Heave the bags backs on, down the street to cross on the overhead bridge, back up the street to try somewhere else.

Booked.

Bags, bridge, try again.

Booked.

Bags, taxi, try again.

We finally find a place that is somewhere that I cannot explain because I cannot explain where any place is in Beijing.

And so, forward with the Day of Cliché.

Cliché no.1: Shopping.  I’m not really one for doing a lot of shopping while traveling, and I am not very good at haggling over prices.  I would rather simply not buy something than invest a ton of time in arguing the price down only to feel bad about screwing these people out of the ten yuan that they obviously need more than I do.  (I suppose I could pay the full, ridiculously high asking price, but I don’t really want to do that either.)  But I’ve been watching Sam, the Mistress of Bargaining, and decide to try it out if I see something cool while walking through Silk Street - a large, multi-level department store filled with individual booths and aggressive proprietors.

Kristy and I are obvious marks as soon as we walk into the building.  My height alerts every salesperson on the entire floor to my presence so they can prepare their shouted advertisement as I walk within earshot.

“YOU NEED SILK KIMONO PAJAMAS?!!!?”  I can hardly tell if they are asking me a question or informing me that I do, in fact, need silk kimono pajamas.  I just love the notion of someone asking me if I need silk kimono pajamas, like anybody really needs that.

I’ve never seen such in-your-face endorsements before: it isn’t like they are just sitting there, announcing their goods into the wind; they make eye contact, grab your sleeve, stand in your way so you can’t get away.  In one narrow section all the girls come out of their booths and physically block me as I watch Sam and Kristy get swallowed up in the crowd.  I try refusing to make eye contact and ignoring their merchandise, but they don’t let up, so I experiment with a small step-and-bump into the girl in front of me who is busy displaying a scarf that is, apparently, “very good quality.”  No movement.  I push harder, she pushes back.  I turn to wedge my shoulder into a small opening between girls, and they feign outrage and injury in the hopes I will feel bad and turn back.  Not a chance.

“GUCCI PURSE, GUCCI BELT, GUCCI SHOES!!”  What is it, exactly, that makes the person at the end of the row think, just maybe, I will stop and buy from them when I just passed twenty other shops selling the exact same things?

(Side note: in Mandarin, the letter x is pronounced as sh, so some of the fake Gucci stuff has labels sewn into them that say Guxxi.)

I decide to try my hand at this haggling business in the quieter Corridor of Cashmere Sweaters.  So I start looking at and feeling some *fingerquotes* “Polo” sweaters when I see the You’d-Have-To-Be-An-Idiot-To-Pay-This opening quote displayed on a calculator screen.  800 yuan for a sweater.  That’s almost $120.  So I laugh at her and turn to leave.  She backs down quickly, hands me the calculator to put in my opening bid.  I lowball it without mercy, something like 30 or 40 yuan.  She laughs at me in turn.  I ignore her for a while, feel some more sweaters, pick out a couple of colors that I like.  I try to get a better deal if I buy two.  As I verrrrry slowly come up from 80 yuan, she inches down from 500.  So I feign disgust and pretend to leave again.  She shouts me back into the booth.  More inching, another frustrated “exit.”  Finally, she is clearly unhappy that she has spent all this time on me and I won’t budge on 110 yuan.  For two sweaters.  She jerks the sweaters into a bag, takes my money and practically throws me out of the shop.  I pay $8 for each sweater when she wanted $115.  I’d be pissed too, I guess.  I see her later and judge from her scowl that she recognizes me.

So I’m actually enjoying the haggling.  It makes my sweaters feel even more satisfyingly soft.

CCTV Building in the background – the structure turns three different corners in the air.  It’s like two tall, crooked vertical towers with a horizontal section that makes a 90 degree turn connecting them.  Very cool.

Cliché no.2: Chinese Acrobats.  If you ever want to feel super special in China, there are a couple of things you can do: wander through the Forbidden City so a bunch of people ask to take pictures with you, or go to an acrobatics show and have ushers serve you ice cream while you sit in the centrally located VIP seats.  And just ignore that fact that all the other people in the theater are also sitting in the VIP seating.  Besides, the important thing is they serve you ice cream!!

Cliché no.3: Beijing’s Heinous Snack Street, home of The Most Disgusting Things on Sticks.  Scorpions, beetles, crickets, cockroaches, roasted to perfection, served on convenient skewers.  Stupendous after-theater fare.

Bee Cocoons, anyone?  Silk worm, sea snakes, centipedes?  Anyone for some beetles?

Delicious Starfish

For a palette cleanser, we stop for some more ice cream at Häagen Dazs, where you sit down and get served ice water with lemon while you eat.  And where the little counter in front of the cash register is sloped so Kristy’s ice cream immediately slides off and spills on the ground, requiring the smarmy scooper-guy to re-scoop it for her while we laugh.

Tomorrow we’re going on a Great Wall tour, so that should be pretty fun!

More: http://batteredleatherjournal.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/day-26-the-day-of-cliche/

Neha Kumar & Agnes R. Quisumbing (IFPRI)

Access it here

This paper assesses long-term impacts of vegetable and polyculture fish production technologies on a variety of measures of household and individual well-being in Bangladesh. In 1996–1997, households were surveyed in three sites where nongovernmental organizations and extension programs were disseminating agricultural technologies—about two to six years after the technologies were first introduced. The same households were reinterviewed in 2006–2007.

Using nearest-neighbor matching to construct a statistical comparison group, we find that long-term impacts differ across agricultural technology interventions and across outcomes. Long-term impacts on household-level consumption expenditures and asset accumulation are, in general, insignificant in the improved vegetables sites, but are positive and significant in the individually operated fishponds sites. Interestingly, impacts on individual nutrient intake, nutrient adequacy, and nutritional status do not necessarily follow the pattern of household-level impacts. The improved vegetable program, despite insignificant or even negative impacts at the household level, seems to have resulted in increases in vitamin A consumption (and iron consumption for men), an increase in average weight-for-age Z-scores among children, and a reduction in the proportion of girls stunted and the proportion of boys underweight. Women in the improved vegetable program also experienced increases in body mass index. Impacts in the group-operated fishponds sites on nutrient intake are mostly negative, although we do find improvements in weight-for-age Z-scores and a decline in stunting and wasting among boys. Although one would expect significant improvements in nutritional status in the individually operated fishponds sites, impacts on nutritional status are mixed. Nutrient availability and the fraction of members consuming the recommended daily allowances have improved significantly for most nutrients considered, among men and women. Although indicators of long-term nutritional status worsen, short-term nutritional status indicators improve. The fraction of women with low hemoglobin levels also decreases significantly. We argue that the differences in long-term and short-term impacts arise from several causes: differences in dissemination and targeting mechanisms that may affect what types of households adopt and benefit from the technologies; initial existing differences between control and treatment groups (controlled for using matching methods); the degree to which a technology is divisible and easily disseminated outside the treatment group; and finally, intrahousehold allocation processes that determine how gains from the new technology are allocated among household members.

More: http://genderfoodpolicy.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/publication-access-adoption-and-diffusion-understanding-the-long-term-impacts-of-improved-vegetable-and-fish-technologies-in-bangladesh/

The Post reports US expert: China oil spill far bigger than stated

A worker cleans up the oil at the Nantuo Fishing Harbor.

More: http://sharmamridul.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/china-oil-spill/

A view of the Kashrote locality, near AKRSP office – Images: Sher Shah & Asghar Khan – via PAMIR TIMES

More: http://pamirtimes.net/2010/07/30/pictory-ii-floods-in-gilgit-city/

More: http://ismailimail.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/floods-in-gilgit-city-via-pamir-times/

Mankind’s selfishness and greed is going to eventually destroy this planet. The animal kingdom is certainly in jeopardy as long as we continue deforestation, poaching and polluting oceans, lakes and rivers. TGO

Refer to story below. Source: Associated Press

JAKARTA, Indonesia – The most threatened tortoise in the world is being sold openly at a plant and animal exposition in the heart of Indonesia’s capital, highlighting concerns about the rampant — and growing — illegal pet trade.

The country has become a major trading hub for endangered tortoises and freshwater turtles, including species from Africa, South America and Asia, said Chris Shepherd of TRAFFIC, a British-based international wildlife monitoring network

He said the government has failed to follow up on repeated promises to crackdown.

Those found Friday at Jakarta’s annual flora and fauna expo — held from July 2 until Aug. 2 — included the world’s most threatened ploughshare tortoise and the critically endangered radiated tortoises, both from Madagascar and fetching around $150.

Cages also were filled with rare Indian star tortoises, which are protected under the Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species, known as CITES, and the endangered pig-nose tortoise, from Indonesia’s easternmost province of Papua, both selling for $1,500.

Vendors told The Associated Press other threatened tortoises and turtles not found on display could easily be obtained for a price.

“Recent surveys, and this expo, have shown that the trade continues and, in fact, now involves more illegally imported species than ever,” said Shepherd. “Dealers know full well that it is illegal and are taking advantage of the enforcement agencies lack of action.”

Indonesia, one of the most biologically diverse nations in the world, has for years sold everything from eagles and leopard cats to gibbons as pets in the capital, though often less openly. Shady transactions continue to take place in the back alleys of the popular Pramuka Market.

____

Online:

TRAFFIC: http://www.traffic.org/reptiles-amphibians/

Ploughshare Tortoise: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/9016/0

Radiated Tortoise: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/9014/0

More: http://thegreatone22.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/expo-shows-illegal-pet-trade-rampant-in-indonesia/

All of our unplanned, haphazard, Sam’ll-handle-it traveling had been going swimmingly, but we finally hit a snag this morning.  We arrive back in China after the splendid overnight train from Shanghai and take a taxi straight to the Liyun Apartotels that were so good to us.  We explode into the lobby, a dust cloud of backpacks and random limbs.

But it’s booked solid.  Heave the bags backs on, down the street to cross on the overhead bridge, back up the street to try somewhere else.

Booked.

Bags, bridge, try again.

Booked.

Bags, taxi, try again.

We finally find a place that is somewhere that I cannot explain because I cannot explain where any place is in Beijing.

And so, forward with the Day of Cliché.

Cliché no.1: Shopping.  I’m not really one for doing a lot of shopping while traveling, and I am not very good at haggling over prices.  I would rather simply not buy something than invest a ton of time in arguing the price down only to feel bad about screwing these people out of the ten yuan that they obviously need more than I do.  (I suppose I could pay the full, ridiculously high asking price, but I don’t really want to do that either.)  But I’ve been watching Sam, the Mistress of Bargaining, and decide to try it out if I see something cool while walking through Silk Street - a large, multi-level department store filled with individual booths and aggressive proprietors.

Kristy and I are obvious marks as soon as we walk into the building.  My height alerts every salesperson on the entire floor to my presence so they can prepare their shouted advertisement as I walk within earshot.

“YOU NEED SILK KIMONO PAJAMAS?!!!?”  I can hardly tell if they are asking me a question or informing me that I do, in fact, need silk kimono pajamas.  I just love the notion of someone asking me if I need silk kimono pajamas, like anybody really needs that.

I’ve never seen such in-your-face endorsements before: it isn’t like they are just sitting there, announcing their goods into the wind; they make eye contact, grab your sleeve, stand in your way so you can’t get away.  In one narrow section all the girls come out of their booths and physically block me as I watch Sam and Kristy get swallowed up in the crowd.  I try refusing to make eye contact and ignoring their merchandise, but they don’t let up, so I experiment with a small step-and-bump into the girl in front of me who is busy displaying a scarf that is, apparently, “very good quality.”  No movement.  I push harder, she pushes back.  I turn to wedge my shoulder into a small opening between girls, and they feign outrage and injury in the hopes I will feel bad and turn back.  Not a chance.

“GUCCI PURSE, GUCCI BELT, GUCCI SHOES!!”  What is it, exactly, that makes the person at the end of the row think, just maybe, I will stop and buy from them when I just passed twenty other shops selling the exact same things?

(Side note: in Mandarin, the letter x is pronounced as sh, so some of the fake Gucci stuff has labels sewn into them that say Guxxi.)

I decide to try my hand at this haggling business in the quieter Corridor of Cashmere Sweaters.  So I start looking at and feeling some *fingerquotes* “Polo” sweaters when I see the You’d-Have-To-Be-An-Idiot-To-Pay-This opening quote displayed on a calculator screen.  800 yuan for a sweater.  That’s almost $120.  So I laugh at her and turn to leave.  She backs down quickly, hands me the calculator to put in my opening bid.  I lowball it without mercy, something like 30 or 40 yuan.  She laughs at me in turn.  I ignore her for a while, feel some more sweaters, pick out a couple of colors that I like.  I try to get a better deal if I buy two.  As I verrrrry slowly come up from 80 yuan, she inches down from 500.  So I feign disgust and pretend to leave again.  She shouts me back into the booth.  More inching, another frustrated “exit.”  Finally, she is clearly unhappy that she has spent all this time on me and I won’t budge on 110 yuan.  For two sweaters.  She jerks the sweaters into a bag, takes my money and practically throws me out of the shop.  I pay $8 for each sweater when she wanted $115.  I’d be pissed too, I guess.  I see her later and judge from her scowl that she recognizes me.

So I’m actually enjoying the haggling.  It makes my sweaters feel even more satisfyingly soft.

CCTV Building in the background – the structure turns three different corners in the air.  It’s like two tall, crooked vertical towers with a horizontal section that makes a 90 degree turn connecting them.  Very cool.

Cliché no.2: Chinese Acrobats.  If you ever want to feel super special in China, there are a couple of things you can do: wander through the Forbidden City so a bunch of people ask to take pictures with you, or go to an acrobatics show and have ushers serve you ice cream while you sit in the centrally located VIP seats.  And just ignore that fact that all the other people in the theater are also sitting in the VIP seating.  Besides, the important thing is they serve you ice cream!!

Cliché no.3: Beijing’s Heinous Snack Street, home of The Most Disgusting Things on Sticks.  Scorpions, beetles, crickets, cockroaches, roasted to perfection, served on convenient skewers.  Stupendous after-theater fare.

Bee Cocoons, anyone?  Silk worm, sea snakes, centipedes?  Anyone for some beetles?

Delicious Starfish

For a palette cleanser, we stop for some more ice cream at Häagen Dazs, where you sit down and get served ice water with lemon while you eat.  And where the little counter in front of the cash register is sloped so Kristy’s ice cream immediately slides off and spills on the ground, requiring the smarmy scooper-guy to re-scoop it for her while we laugh.

Tomorrow we’re going on a Great Wall tour, so that should be pretty fun!

More: http://batteredleatherjournal.wordpress.com/2010/07/30/day-26-the-day-of-cliche/